I started making a patch for Ruby 1.9 and ran into something odd. The 1.9.3 rpms built from the ruby.spec project, provide a ruby(abi) of 1.9.1. I assure you that 1.9.3 and 1.9.1 are not 100% compatible. Could we move the ruby.spec rpms to 1.9.3? Or if we want something more generic possibly 1.9.
Mike On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 13.1.2012 02:59, Michael Stahnke napsal(a): >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Stahnke<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Has gem2rpm been updated for the Ruby 1.9 changes? The guidelines >>> seem quite a bit different, an the gem2rpm macros in the current state >>> (at least on EL6) don't map up. Things like >>> >>> %gemdir rather than %gem_dir. >> >> I probably should have also been clear I am well-aware the Ruby 1.9 >> changes won't impact EL6, but at my work they do :) >> _______________________________________________ >> ruby-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > > > It was not updated yet, but any help is greatly appreciated. I am accepting > pull requests on github. > > Vit > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
