Sorry for my late reply recently...
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 02/14/2012 06:00 PM +9:00:
Hi,
Together with FPC, we are working toward new packaging guidelines, however
there is one sticking point I'd like to ask you. Toshio is proposing, that
we should always repackage the gem in prep section [1]. However, I dislike this
proposal [2]. What are your thoughts?
Vit
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby#Building_gems
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/134#comment:34
- As I wrote in the fpc ticket, I don't think repackaging gems in
this way is supported and IMO there is no guarantee that this way
works at any time.
- I don't see the merit for writing
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 17
Provides: ruby(foo) = %{version}
%else
Provides: rubygem(foo) = %{version}
%endif
For F-16 and below, ruby(foo) and rubygem(foo) is actually different.
And chaging provides / requires on F-17 and above doesn't
seem to have much sense.
Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
