On 2012-04-14 21:08, Wan Zuhao wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
What you've suggested is definitely a good idea. I do agree it's
important
to reflect which *version*, in addtion to the name, link, etc. of a
particular gem that was converted into rpm, as sometimes the latest
patches
and bug fixes are not included in the rpm.
The point is also, sometimes bug fixes (especially security issues)
*are* in fact included in the RPM, but the gem/rpm package version
number would not reflect that.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
--
Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
m: +44 74 2516 3817
w: http://www.kolabsys.com
pgp: 9342 BF08
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
