Dne 20.11.2012 11:31, Charles Oliver Nutter napsal(a):
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda <[email protected]> wrote:
There is a small regression hidden in this: The gems installed with "sudo gem 
install" currently place their extensions under /usr/local/lib64/gems/exts, which 
would also change to /usr/local/lib64/gems/ruby, causing these gems to need 
reinstallation if my changes are applied, but I don't think this should keep us from 
doing this transition.
I don't think anything can keep you from doing this transition, since
exts will never be portable across 32/64 or MRI/Rubinius or
1.8/1.9/2.0 C API...it kinda just has to happen if there's going to be
support for multiple installed Rubies on a single system.

I did not see you mention different locations for 1.8 versus 1.9
versus 2.0 exts...they are also not generally portable.

We do not plan to support multiple MRI versions. So there is no need for that.

However, this might or might not come into play for Rubinius. But if that will be needed, the gems should go into /usr/lib[64]/gems/rubinius/{1.8,1.9,2.0} probably. In that case the line [1] will need some additional tweaks. But the important is that the rest of gems will stay untouched.


[1] https://github.com/bkabrda/jruby.spec/blob/master/rubygems/operating_system.rb#L66


Vit
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

Reply via email to