BTW, is it not the default behavior? There should be no jruby executable in the official distro.
-- mj On Dec 13, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Michal Fojtik wrote: > On 12/13, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 12.12.2012 18:36, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): >>> On 11/29/2012 09:43 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: >>>> - Two connected problems: 1) RPM generates auto provides from >>>> shebangs, e.g. #!/usr/bin/ruby will automatically require ruby >>>> package; 2) How to run programs with #!/usr/bin/ruby shebangs >>>> under JRuby? >>> >>> We already have mechanism for that: >>> >>> /etc/alternatives/* >>> update-alternatives(8) >>> >>> /usr/bin/ruby will be symlink to /etc/alternatives/ruby, which >>> will be symlink to /usr/bin/jruby or /usr/bin/ruby19 (previously >>> known as /usr/bin/ruby). >>> And let update-alternatives manage the defaults. > > Maybe a stupid idea, but why we just don't prefix the 'jruby' with 'j'? > > So we can have lancher in '/usr/bin/jruby'. Similar for irb, gem... > (jirb, jgem, etc...) > > Then the shebang will be '#!/usr/bin/jruby' and the MRI version can > cooexist with the jruby. > > -- michal > >> >> Yes, we have, but you need to have root privileges to use them. That >> is not cool. We believe that something like this script [1] could >> make better service. >> >> >> Vít >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/bkabrda/multiruby/blob/master/ruby >> _______________________________________________ >> ruby-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > > -- > Michal Fojtik <[email protected]> > Deltacloud API, CloudForms > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
