Dne 2.1.2013 11:29, Philip Rhoades napsal(a):
Vít,
On 2013-01-02 19:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Philip,
Dne 1.1.2013 17:38, Philip Rhoades napsal(a):
People,
I have just upgraded to Fedora 18 x86_64 and installed all the
Ruby/Rails RPMs but I notice when I create a test rails app and then
add something to Gemfile and do "bundle install", the system starts
pulling in all the native Gems - I would like to stick to just using
RPMs
You could try the '--local', which should prefer already installed gems.
- so I presume "bundle install" does not get used in the change to
the RPM environment? (ie I should manually install the missing gem
RPMs).
I am not aware of any better way how to do it. But may be somebody
from Aeolus or Katello could provide more information, since they are
using similar workflow, i.e. they are developing with RPM gems.
Also, I presume one has to be careful about doing a system-wide
update of RPMs with "yum update" in case updated Gems break stuff
specified in Gemfile.lock?
Once you have everything installed, the 'bundle install --local'
should update your Gemfile.lock just fine.
Actually, is there reason to use Gemfile and Bundler at all? I would
say that the Rails application will work without it just fine.
Basically, that is the first thing that I was asking about but you
didn't really answer my second question about possibly breaking stuff
by using "yum update".
I hope that the chance that "yum update" will break anything is smaller
than that "bundle update" will break something. As for Rails for
example, I can promise, that we are doing only backports of security
fixes and this applies to every gem I own (maintain). Cannot speak about
other gems though.
Vít
Thanks,
Phil.
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
