On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 1.4.2014 12:46, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> * I'd go with update to minitest 5 (probably tomorrow, unless you'll be >> fast enough to point out some weak points ;) > > rubygem-minitest-5.3.1-1.fc21 is now available in Rawhide [1]. >
My first gem package broke yesterday on this :) rubygem-geoip-1.4.0-1 I've submitted patches upstream for Minitest 5 support, and rubygem-geoip-1.4.0-2 builds successfully. I did have to migrate away from testrb in %check in order to make my backwards-compatibility-with-mintest-4 hack succeed. I don't know what testrb was doing differently, but it's probably a good idea to remove testrb in any regard. By the way, do you have a list of all the gems that failed to build with Minitest 5? I'd like to take a look and see if I can help fix some of them (particularly the ones that are mine... :) - Ken On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 1.4.2014 12:46, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> * I'd go with update to minitest 5 (probably tomorrow, unless you'll be >> fast enough to point out some weak points ;) >> > > > rubygem-minitest-5.3.1-1.fc21 is now available in Rawhide [1]. > > > Vít > > > > > [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6701679 > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
