I just pushed spec file updated to r47902 into SCM. The scratch build is available here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7858396 Vít Dne 15.9.2014 v 17:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi everybody, > > Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 > release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start > looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and > scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, > no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. > > What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but > here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: > > * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM > macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. > On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ > (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). > > * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be > something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should > be safer. > > * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is > that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you > have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, > but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will > not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages > rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's > dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these > days anyway, right? ;) > > * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, > but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. > > Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. > > Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues > you encountered. > > Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, > what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems > that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to > get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) > > > Vít > > > > [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 > [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 > [3] > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8e2921fd5a3125b7ce2487bb449b2e6db40cc3c0 > [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common > [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 > [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
