Dne 10.11.2014 v 14:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > - Or not, you can use BuildRequires(rspec2). Note that > 2.x version rspec (script) is renamed to %_bindir/rspec2, > you'll probably have to do > $ rspec2 spec/ > for example. > >
Used the rspec2 command for the first time, I have strange feeling about it. Shouldn't we provide also plain rspec command for rspec2? Let me explain. When you install RSpec 2.x and RSpec 3.x side by side by gem install, you'll get single rspec executable. You can later choose which version you actually want to execute by something like "rspec _2.2_". So while I agree that rspec2 is a bit simpler than the previous command, I'd say that the rspec command should be available as well, since when only RSpec 2.x is available on your system, it is unexpected to don't have the rspec command available, otherwise user experience is broken IMO. Thoughts? I'll probably file bug later ... Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
