Ok, so if I asked for the SIG group, I would need to fill this template:
PkgDB2 allows FAS group to maintain packages in Fedora. Before applying for a new group, you should ask for a new mailing list or agree with the different people concerned to use the mailing list you already have. Once the mailing list is sorted out, please create a bugzilla account for this address. The list will be assigned or made cc to the bugs open against the package the group has ACLs for and will be added to the <pkg>-owner@fp.o alias. IOW what ML should be used? Can we re-user ruby-sig ML? Wouldn't it increase the traffic too much (or may be there would be some traffic finally? ;)) ? BTW I went ahead and asked for the group for Copr builds: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5329 Let me know if you are interested. Vít Dne 26.5.2016 v 09:32 Dominic Cleal napsal(a): > On 20/05/16 11:57, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote: >> 1) Would you be interested to create ruby-sig group in FAS? We could >> make the group owner of some packages and in turn, the members of the >> group could maintain the packages, without explicitly asking for some ACLs. > I think this would be a very good idea. I often come across small tasks > to update or fix gems that I could help out with quickly and easily if > the package was owned by the group. > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
