Dne 14.9.2016 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > Hello, Vít: > > Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/13/2016 12:01 AM: >> Hi all, >> >> -preview2 of the Ruby 2.4  was released by upstream and here is the >> test build for you (ARM is not finished yet, but I hope it will pass): >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15602333 >> >> You can find the necessary changes in private-ruby-2.4 branch of >> dist-git. >> >> When I did the last snapshot, I mentioned, that Tcl/Tk was moved into >> gem. But upstream took step further and dropped the Tcl/Tk support from >> the Ruby stdlib entirely. The tk gem is the only option now. Hence I >> dropped the subpackage as well. The only caveat is that there is not >> good place to obsolete this package. I figured out that I place the >> obsoletes into ruby-libs to remove the ruby-tcltk package from the >> system, but if you have any better idea, please let me know. >> >> Vít >> >>  >> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/09/08/ruby-2-4-0-preview2-released/ >> > > Perhaps packaging ruby/tk is the smartest: > https://github.com/ruby/tk > > Looks like the git log or so, the above seems to be exactly the > replacement > for previously rubylib Tcl/Tk.
Yes, it should be drop in replacement as far as I understand it. > > > If you don't have time, I may try packaging in a week or two weeks. If I am not mistaken, there is nothing in Fedora, what would depend on ruby-tcltk, so for me it is very little priority. Thank you if you are going to pickup the maintenance. Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://email@example.com