Dne 14.9.2016 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Hello, Vít:
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/13/2016 12:01 AM:
>> Hi all,
>> -preview2 of the Ruby 2.4  was released by upstream and here is the
>> test build for you (ARM is not finished yet, but I hope it will pass):
>> You can find the necessary changes in private-ruby-2.4 branch of
>> When I did the last snapshot, I mentioned, that Tcl/Tk was moved into
>> gem. But upstream took step further and dropped the Tcl/Tk support from
>> the Ruby stdlib entirely. The tk gem is the only option now. Hence I
>> dropped the subpackage as well. The only caveat is that there is not
>> good place to obsolete this package. I figured out that I place the
>> obsoletes into ruby-libs to remove the ruby-tcltk package from the
>> system, but if you have any better idea, please let me know.
> Perhaps packaging ruby/tk is the smartest:
> Looks like the git log or so, the above seems to be exactly the
> for previously rubylib Tcl/Tk.
Yes, it should be drop in replacement as far as I understand it.
> If you don't have time, I may try packaging in a week or two weeks.
If I am not mistaken, there is nothing in Fedora, what would depend on
ruby-tcltk, so for me it is very little priority. Thank you if you are
going to pickup the maintenance.
ruby-sig mailing list