Dne 14.9.2016 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Hello, Vít:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/13/2016 12:01 AM:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> -preview2 of the Ruby 2.4 [1] was released by upstream and here is the
>> test build for you (ARM is not finished yet, but I hope it will pass):
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15602333
>>
>> You can find the necessary changes in private-ruby-2.4 branch of
>> dist-git.
>>
>> When I did the last snapshot, I mentioned, that Tcl/Tk was moved into
>> gem. But upstream took step further and dropped the Tcl/Tk support from
>> the Ruby stdlib entirely. The tk gem is the only option now. Hence I
>> dropped the subpackage as well. The only caveat is that there is not
>> good place to obsolete this package. I figured out that I place the
>> obsoletes into ruby-libs to remove the ruby-tcltk package from the
>> system, but if you have any better idea, please let me know.
>>
>> Vít
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/09/08/ruby-2-4-0-preview2-released/
>>
>
> Perhaps packaging ruby/tk is the smartest:
> https://github.com/ruby/tk
>
> Looks like the git log or so, the above seems to be exactly the
> replacement
> for previously rubylib Tcl/Tk.

Yes, it should be drop in replacement as far as I understand it.

>
>
> If you don't have time, I may try packaging in a week or two weeks.

If I am not mistaken, there is nothing in Fedora, what would depend on
ruby-tcltk, so for me it is very little priority. Thank you if you are
going to pickup the maintenance.


Vít
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to