> Not this way. We would just incrementally build Ruby using previous Ruby > (IOW there would be `BR: ruby` in .spec file). That would be likely good > as long as Fedora does not introduce new architecture. Then we would > need manually build some Ruby, probably without patches and then use > this Ruby for build of Ruby with patches. > > I think if we are able to do this right, then we can choose from option > 1 and 2 by setting the right flags. Both options has their pros and cons.
I see. The pattern `BR: ruby` in ruby.spec file is actually like what gcc is doing as `BuildRequires: gcc, gcc-c++` in gcc.spec file. Maybe we are able to do this right. -- Jun | He - His - Him _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
