But Prawn's test suite is enforcing old pdf-reader 1.4.1 ...

Vít



Dne 06. 05. 20 v 11:58 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
> That works on Fedora Rawhide if this is the expected output:
>
> ~~~
>
> $ ruby -e "
> require 'prawn'
> require 'pdf/reader'
> require 'pdf/inspector'
>
> Prawn::Document.generate 'test.pdf' do
>   text 'yo'
> end
>
> puts ((PDF::Reader.new 'test.pdf').page 1).text
>
> File.open 'test.pdf' do |fd|
>   pdf = PDF::Inspector::Text.analyze fd
>   puts pdf.strings
> end
> "
> yo
> yo
>
>
> $ rpm -q rubygem-{prawn,pdf-{core,inspector,reader}}
> rubygem-prawn-2.2.2-4.fc32.noarch
> rubygem-pdf-core-0.8.1-4.fc32.noarch
> rubygem-pdf-inspector-1.3.0-5.fc32.noarch
> rubygem-pdf-reader-2.1.0-5.fc32.noarch
>
> ~~~
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 06. 05. 20 v 11:44 Dan Allen napsal(a):
>> Here's a test script to prove it:
>>
>> require 'prawn'
>> require 'pdf/reader'
>> require 'pdf/inspector'
>>
>> Prawn::Document.generate 'test.pdf' do
>>   text 'yo'
>> end
>>
>> puts ((PDF::Reader.new 'test.pdf').page 1).text
>>
>> File.open 'test.pdf' do |fd|
>>   pdf = PDF::Inspector::Text.analyze fd
>>   puts pdf.strings
>> end
>>
>> I ran it on this branch:
>> https://github.com/mojavelinux/prawn/tree/2.2.2-pdf-core-0.8.x
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:33 AM Dan Allen <dan.j.al...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:dan.j.al...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Vit,
>>
>>     It seems to be due to this change:
>>     
>> https://github.com/prawnpdf/pdf-core/commit/1b179c18359f1642f9294c8c23a8f1be51b48414
>>
>>     This is making the font in the PDF (or at least the font
>>     metadata) corrupt. A PDF generated using Prawn 2.2.2 w/ pdf-core
>>     0.8.1 cannot be read by PDF::Reader. It says there's a syntax error.
>>
>>     Syntax Error (221557): Arg #0 to 'Tf' operator is wrong type (string)
>>     Syntax Error (221565): No font in show
>>
>>     Best Regards,
>>
>>     -Dan
>>
>>     On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:53 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com
>>     <mailto:vondr...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Dan, thx for looking into this. Do you have more details? Is
>>         there some patch we need to add on top of Prawn to fix this?
>>         I am asking because I am not sure there is easy way do revert
>>         the pdf-core update (we can always bump epoch, but this sucks
>>         for other reasons).
>>
>>
>>         Vít
>>
>>
>>         Dne 06. 05. 20 v 10:31 Dan Allen napsal(a):
>>>         I've done some tests and what I've determined is that prawn
>>>         2.2.2 is incompatible with pdf-core 0.8.1. These gems are
>>>         extremely tightly coupled because they're essentially one
>>>         library. Thus, I think it's a mistake for Fedora to be
>>>         packaging pdf-core 0.8.1 at this time. It should either wait
>>>         for the next release of Prawn or package the prerelease from
>>>         master (which is tested against pdf-core 0.8.1).
>>>
>>>         Best Regards,
>>>
>>>         -Dan
>>>
>>>         -- 
>>>         Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org 
>>> <mailto:ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>>         To unsubscribe send an email to 
>>> ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
>>> <mailto:ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>>         Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>>         List Guidelines: 
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>         List Archives: 
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>         <mailto:ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>         To unsubscribe send an email to
>>         ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>         <mailto:ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>         Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>         https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>         List Guidelines:
>>         https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>         List Archives:
>>         
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to