Dne 01. 10. 20 v 20:21 Pavel Valena napsal(a): > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> >> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 12:02:02 PM >> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 >> >> >> Dne 01. 10. 20 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a): >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> >>>> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:31:10 AM >>>> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3 >>>> >>>> >>>> Dne 30. 09. 20 v 22:16 Jaroslav Prokop napsal(a): >>>> >>>>> On 30/09/2020 21:33, Pavel Valena wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> following on my previous email (bellow), I'm working on regenerating >>>>>> the list of packages `ruby-rails` group in Koschei. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've done some fixes to package resolving in my script (I'm left with >>>>>> 3 unresolved /ambiguous/ packages as well), and got current list: >>>>>> https://gist.github.com/pvalena/ccdd482ace158bc55c891528e2be22ce >>>> I think there is missing rubygem-mysql2, which might not appear >>>> anywhere, because it is just optional, but we should not forget to >>>> include it in the list. For the similar reason, it would be nice to keep >>>> rubygem-mongo on the list. >>> Hmm, but if it's not in the buildroot, should we concern ourselves with it? >>> Or do we care for weak dependencies the same? I could add those explicitly >>> (Recommends -> Require for those builds), or could be just on some >>> "Includelist" WDYT? >> >> I think there should be some initial list of packages we do care about, >> this should be probably: >> >> ruby > Not sure about ruby itself. Rails could theoretically run on any ruby > runtime, right?
We don't have any other runtime ... > Anyway there's not much harm to have it there, if you insist. I'm simply > missing the point, ... now I realized. We don't have a `ruby` Koschei group. > Maybe that's something we want instead? It is probably easier to search for "ruby". I don't want to create some dump groups, which will nobody care about. "rails" group would deserve more attention on itself. > >> rubygem-rails and actually everything what appears in the Gemfile of >> fresh RoR app > Ok, good idea. Although we currently don't have the asset pipeline > (webpacker). Please don't add on the list any packages we don't have (sorry, couldn't resist :D) > >> and some DB adapters: >> >> rubygem-mysql2 >> >> rubygem-mongo >> >> rubygem-pg (mongo got somehow pulled in, but it is just by coincidence >> I'd say). > > Yes, I think this corresponds to comps group. I'll take all packages from > there. Good idea. V. _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
