On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:41 AM Christopher Brown <chris.br...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for this. The issue I think is that there is a large number of > dependencies and AIUI, Fedora doesn't allow these to be bundled with the > gem[1]. This means a fairly significant task creating packages for a variety > of nodejs dependencies amongst other things, e.g. Vega[2] has a fairly rapid > release schedule. > > The more I consider the situation, the more I'm thinking that rpm is not the > correct packaging format for asciidoctor-pdf and friends given their long > list of dependencies and that a better fit would be a containerised > deployment or perhaps flatpak/snap. > > However I thought I'd put this out for further responses from anyone with a > vested interest. > > 1. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries > 2. https://github.com/vega/vega/tags >
Bundling Nodejs dependencies is perfectly fine. Most of us do that now. Gem and C/C++ dependencies should not be bundled, though. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
