Dne 14. 10. 22 v 19:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26:Hi again,I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the scratch build is here:https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720I have not spot anything which would caught my attention. Please give it a try and let me know in case of issues.Thx Vít [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/134Thank you for your work.While Pavel is trying rebuilding rubygem- packages continuously, now I triedmyself rebuilding. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test/ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/heavypkg-newruby-test/ So far * Out of 495 rubygem- packages: - ~447 packages built successfully - ~48 failed to build* And out of other 58 packages which has "BR: ruby-devel" or "BR: pkgconfig(ruby)"- ~53 packages built successfully - ~5 failed to buildJust a quick glance at these (I have not checked all of these, just selectedsome of them)* Removal of File.exists? / Object#=~ / "tainted"ness affects several pacakges * rubygem-jekyll seems to be affected by keywords / positional argument treatmentchange??By the way, is it better to create "central" bugzilla ticket to keep track of ruby32related issues for each package?There should be created the tracker as part of Ruby 3.2 change proposal process. So maybe I should prepare the change proposal early and we would get the tracker "for free".
I have put together the change proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description" chapter, where the changes are described, it is basically just copy/paste of the Ruby 3.1 change proposal.
I have marked the change as "ChangeReadyForWrangler" already. BTW everybody feel free to add yourselves as a change (co-)owner.
Vít
VítRegards, Mamoru _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.orgFedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelinesList Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
