Re: Ruby 3.2 - mass-prebuild

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 13. 12. 22 v 9:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):

Few months ago, I have noticed some rumors about mass-prebuild tool [1]. Since Ruby 3.2 rebuild seems to be nice opportunity to test this out, I gave it a try. This is my config (there is really not much to configure ;)) :

~~~

$ cat mpb.config
archs: x86_64
chroot: fedora-rawhide
name: ruby-3.2
packages:
  ruby:
    src_type: file

data: /home/vondruch/fedora-scm/own/ruby/mpb/
verbose: 1
retry: 5

~~~


And here is the resulting repository:


https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2


And intermediate results:


~~~

    src: /home/vondruch/fedora-scm/own/ruby/ruby-3.2.0~20221212gitece6246057-174.fc38.src.rpm

BTW the interpretation of the results is as follows:

Build status of reverse dependencies: —
    570 out of 571 builds are done.

1 build is still under check, that is to figure out, if the build failure is caused by the updated Ruby or if it was already failed previously:

 Pending: 0
    Running: 0

Nothing is left to build in the official repo

 Success: 527

Number of successful builds.

 Under check: 1

One build is still running in the check repo as explained above.

 Manual confirmation needed: 11

These are the packages which should deserve out attention. They used to build but does not build with Ruby 3.2

 Failed: 32

These packages were already FTBFS


Vít

~~~


I have briefly checked two failures:

1) rubygem-activesupport - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5131908/

Where this might be upstream cure:

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/e4140140af5832e045bf8196d1bcbe9e5276a8fb

2) webkitgtk - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5132009/

I'll try to fix these and run another round of builds.





Vít


[1] https://gitlab.com/fedora/packager-tools/mass-prebuild

[2] https://gitlab.com/fedora/packager-tools/mass-prebuild/-/issues/56


Dne 12. 12. 22 v 22:27 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):

Obviously, the issue is with independent rubygem-json, which was not build by mass-prebuild. This is probably tricky due to rubygem-json being subpackage of ruby while there is also independent RPM. All in all, I am very excited about the mass-prebuild. While there are certainly areas for improvement, the tool is quite easy to setup and execute. I'll encourage everybody to give it a try. I'd say that this can be valuable for testing frameworks updates, which tends to influence huge dependency chains. Also, I have reported around ~6 tickets and the author is very responsive, so I am quite that next version will be much better (e.g. the dependency chain will be properly resolved [2]).

Hi everyone,



https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5126185/



https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95271437



As always, let me know any feedback.

Thx


Vít

I have noticed, that my version/release changes were not correct. IRB could not require ruby-default-gems: Therefore I have prepared yet another update. You can grab the scratch build here: Nothing really interesting there. Although, Bundler have dropped bundled tpmdir gem. Less bundling is always good news.

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue