If we build Ruby 3.3 as an official build for Fedora, the first step after building Ruby would be to take the independent rubygem-json, bump it and build against Ruby 3.3. That would resolve the issue. However, this is just test build, so I don't do that. But it would be probably the right thing to do for your Copr repo. That would be helpful for two reasons:
1) Given the above, it is important to ensure that the rubygem-json rebuild is possible and that there is e.g. no circular dependency which would prohibit this.
2) It would allow to test the upgrade scenario as you did. Vít Dne 13. 09. 23 v 18:38 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
Testing upgrade, I get: ``` # dnf update rubyLast metadata expiration check: 3:45:31 ago on Wed 13 Sep 2023 12:42:06 PM UTC.Dependencies resolved.Problem: problem with installed package rubygem-json-2.6.3-204.fc39.x86_64 - package rubygem-json-2.6.3-204.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires libruby.so.3.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package rubygem-json-2.6.3-204.fc39.x86_64 from rawhide requires libruby.so.3.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both ruby-libs-3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing and ruby-libs-3.2.2-181.fc39.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both ruby-libs-3.2.2-181.fc39.x86_64 from rawhide and ruby-libs-3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing - package ruby-3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing requires libruby.so.3.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package ruby-3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing requires ruby-libs(x86-64) = 3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package ruby-3.2.2-181.fc39.x86_64=====================================================================================================Package Arch Version Repository Size===================================================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): ruby-libs x86_64 3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40 copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing 3.8 M Skipping packages with broken dependencies: ruby x86_64 3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40 copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing 42 k Transaction Summary ===================================================================================================== Skip 2 Packages Nothing to do. Complete! ```While using suggested options ('--allowerasing --best') installs ruby 3.3, json gem is downgraded and then next update says:``` # dnf update 'ruby*'Last metadata expiration check: 3:49:05 ago on Wed 13 Sep 2023 12:42:06 PM UTC.Dependencies resolved.Problem: package rubygem-json-2.6.3-204.fc39.x86_64 from rawhide requires libruby.so.3.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both ruby-libs-3.2.2-181.fc39.x86_64 from rawhide and ruby-libs-3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40.x86_64 from @System - cannot install the best update candidate for package rubygem-json-2.6.3-182.fc40.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package ruby-libs-3.3.0~20230905git7c8932365f-182.fc40.x86_64=====================================================================================================Package Arch Version Repository Size===================================================================================================== Upgrading:rubygem-bundler noarch 2.5.0.dev-182.fc40 copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing 382 k rubygem-rdoc noarch 6.5.0-182.fc40 copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:pvalena:ruby-testing 464 kSkipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):ruby-libs x86_64 3.2.2-181.fc39 rawhide 4.0 MSkipping packages with broken dependencies:rubygem-json x86_64 2.6.3-204.fc39 rawhide 69 kTransaction Summary ===================================================================================================== Upgrade 2 Packages Skip 2 Packages ```Note the bundler and rdoc gems were not updated with the ruby update (I hope they would still work ok).Standalone install works fine & the test suite even passes (or fails or errors the same as with Ruby 3.2).Regards, Pavel On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:53 PM Pavel Valena <pval...@redhat.com> wrote: Hello, I've checked the PR as well - all checks out :) I'll build it in my COPR ruby-testing repo... will keep you posted. On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:17 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: Dne 12. 09. 23 v 10:08 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > * Racc is now bundled gem instead of default gem. That means it will > live in ruby-bundled-gems. I don't think this should have impact on > anything. Actually, this might be problem: https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/pull/1019 I have not verified the changes, but it seems that has the capability in embedding itself into code generated by it. There are several issues I can see: 1) The RDoc will essentially bundle Racc, therefore it should have bundled provide. I see. 2) The generated code will be bigger. 3) If there is some problem with Racc, we will need to regenerate the libraries (OTOH, not sure what was backward compatibility of Racc with the generated code ...) Oh no... Vít Otherwise it sounds great! Thanks for the work! Pavel _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list --ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email toruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
