On 10/16/23 13:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Additionally, what is the reason for having Faraday 2? It seems
octokit requires Faraday, but version 1 should be fine. I am not sure
about Licensee itself, but on the first look, it seems they are having
some troubles with Faraday 2, but I don't see there any direct
dependency ...
There might be something "fun" going on in there:
https://github.com/licensee/licensee/blob/56dc12bbbe1e4e5b967827c46dfee99c7d59a035/Gemfile#L5
https://github.com/licensee/licensee/commit/e0a4987137d9d429bc897a5568c8c6069410d0a1
It seems it doesn't matter for us
https://github.com/octokit/octokit.rb/discussions/1486 They're just
trying to remove a warning which we won't get with older faraday as I
understand it.
Jarek
Vít
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 12:58 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dear Benson,
Yeah, the situation about Faraday is a bit unfortunate. I think that
also rubygem-typhoeus depends on Faraday 1:
https://github.com/typhoeus/typhoeus/blob/f5c5751df49089da89fc2683a23df04850a45604/Gemfile#L18
Nevertheless, would you be open to rather rename the current package
to `rubygem-faraday1` and afterwards bump the `rubygem-faraday` to
version 2? I understand it is more work initially, but it is better
long term.
Thx
Vít
Dne 14. 10. 23 v 18:59 Benson Muite napsal(a):
Am working on packaging rubygem-licensee as it would probably be a
useful complement to scancode-toolkit and other similar tools. It
requires rubygem-faraday >= 2.0 but rubygem-elasticsearch-transport for
elasticsearch 7 requires rubygem-faraday >~ 1.0 so am packaging it as
rubygem-faraday2. Hope this will be ok.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244212
Issue upstream:
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-ruby/issues/2228
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
