I think it will soon deserve change due to:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VANNYD5TKTA25BSYJJX5PMLW7OVZ7HSK/

It would likely still be worth of reporting the `LicenseRef-Callaway-` prefixed identifiers after this ^^ lands.


Vít


Dne 29. 08. 24 v 15:18 Jarek Prokop napsal(a):
Hi all,

end of August is here, and with it a new report for the SPDX rubygems status.

Regards,
Jarek

  * Total rubygems in Fedora: 446
  * Excluded gems:
  rubygem-krb5-auth
rubygem-rgen
rubygem-net-irc
  * Total rubygems checked:   440
  * Fedora License field and gem2rpm license match and license-validate succeeds: 298/440   * license-validate says they are OK SPDX, but licenses may or may not match between Fedora and upstream: 414/440
  * license-validate with converted conjunctions: 414/440
  * Action required: 25/440

  Packages that need to convert to valid SPDX:
rubygem-,            fedora_license
rubygem-ansi,        BSD
rubygem-bcrypt,      MIT and Public Domain and ISC
rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf,MIT and BSD and ISC
rubygem-cookiejar,   BSD
rubygem-ffi,         BSD
rubygem-hashery,     BSD
rubygem-hiredis,     BSD
rubygem-httpclient,  (Ruby or BSD) and Public Domain
rubygem-idn,         ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+
rubygem-macaddr,     Ruby or BSD
rubygem-marcel,      MIT and ASL 2.0
rubygem-narray,      BSD and Ruby
rubygem-ncursesw,    LGPLv2+
rubygem-open4,       BSD or Ruby
rubygem-rack,        MIT and BSD
rubygem-rchardet,    LGPLv2
rubygem-rdoc,        GPL-2.0 AND Ruby AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC-BY-2.5 AND OFL-1.1-RFN
rubygem-rmail,       BSD
rubygem-ruby-libvirt,LGPLv2+
rubygem-ruby-shadow, Public Domain
rubygem-sassc-rails, MIT and OFL
rubygem-scanf,       BSD
rubygem-uuid,        MIT or CC-BY-SA
rubygem-xmlparser,   GPLv2+ and ( Ruby or GPLv2+ or MIT ) and ( GPLv2+ or Artistic )
rubygem-xmlrpc,      Ruby or BSD

  Package author list:
package, owner(, other contributors)
rubygem-ansi: stevetraylen
rubygem-bcrypt: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig
rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf: pvalena
rubygem-cookiejar: pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
rubygem-ffi: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, tdawson
rubygem-hashery: pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
rubygem-hiredis: pvalena, tdawson
rubygem-httpclient: tdawson, brandfbb, maxamillion, rcallicotte
rubygem-idn: spstarr, tdawson
rubygem-macaddr: valtri
rubygem-marcel: pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
rubygem-narray: besser82
rubygem-ncursesw: dcallagh
rubygem-open4: vondruch, tdawson
rubygem-rack: pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch, tdawson
rubygem-rchardet: stevetraylen
rubygem-rdoc: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig
rubygem-rmail: dcallagh
rubygem-ruby-libvirt: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, clalance, tdawson
rubygem-ruby-shadow: terjeros, ignatenkobrain
rubygem-sassc-rails: pvalena
rubygem-scanf: ekohl, brandfbb
rubygem-uuid: valtri
rubygem-xmlparser: schwicke
rubygem-xmlrpc: pvalena

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to