Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/09/02 23:18:
Today, I had a discussion with Mikolaj Izdebsky, maintainer of various Java
pacakges including Ant / Maven. At the beginning, he mentioned possible license
issues he is dealing with in -javadoc subpackages, then he mentioned bundled
jQuery, etc. All these issues are very familiar to me with the rubygem-*-doc
subpackages.
During the brainstorming, one of the proposed solutions was dropping the doc
subpackages altogether. And I wonder, does anybody have use case for the -doc
subpackages. I used to use RI, but I have not used it for ages. Is the RDoc
HTML documentation useful for anybody? I personally always use online
documentation, so I would not necessarily miss those. But does anybody else use
it?
This is more just to measure the sentiment, than that I would plan any action.
OTOH, I would not mind if I would not need to close my eyes because of the
unresolved bundling / licensing issues.
Thanks.
Vít
Personally, if I have something I have to debug related to gem based packages,
I just directly look at the source itself, or go to github.com.
So _me_ won't mind if current rubygem-foo-doc is not packaged, as far as
I can think of this for now.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
