Dne 27. 11. 25 v 10:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi Mamoru,Thanks for the report and investigating the packages 👍 Dne 27. 11. 25 v 8:08 Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig napsal(a):[20] rubygem-sinatrahttps://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/9840612/1) Failure: RdocTest#test_renders_rdoc_files_in_views_path_0 [test/rdoc_test.rb:25]:Expected /<h1[^>]*>Hello From RDoc(<span><a href=\"#label-Hello\+From\+RDoc\">¶<\/a> <a href=\"#(documentation|top)\">↑<\/a><\/span>)?<\/h1>/ to match # encoding: ASCII-8BIT# valid: true"\n<h1 id=\"label-Hello+From+RDoc\"><a href=\"#label-Hello+From+RDoc\">Hello From RDoc</a></h1>\n".2) Failure: RdocTest#test_renders_inline_rdoc_strings_0 [test/rdoc_test.rb:19]:Expected /<h1[^>]*>Hiya(<span><a href=\"#label-Hiya\">¶<\/a> <a href=\"#(documentation|top)\">↑<\/a><\/span>)?<\/h1>/ to match # encoding: ASCII-8BIT# valid: true "\n<h1 id=\"label-Hiya\"><a href=\"#label-Hiya\">Hiya</a></h1>\n". 1036 runs, 2332 assertions, 2 failures, 0 errors, 3 skipsRecently rdoc is upgraded to 2.16.0 and perhaps some output from rdoc changed.
I suspect this change: https://github.com/ruby/rdoc/commit/f48d9e312a59a76e4ec6504259632881fe7c8efa#diff-a351a3da410d54798fb03e8257b7f2741a70ee0f66cb1e52d91cab6fccbbffe7 But so far, I have looked just at RDoc changelog ... Vít
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
