Thanks for moving forward with this.I'll abstain from further comments (unless I am specifically asked) to let other express their opinions :)
Vít Dne 19. 12. 25 v 13:32 Benjamin Beasley via ruby-sig napsal(a):
I am considering a PR by Vít Ondruch for cucumber-messages[1] that would build rubygem-cucumber-messages as a subpackage rather than maintaining it as a separate source package. I am generally inclined to favor the proposal, but it seems to me that it represents an exception to the “MUST” requirement to package RubyGem libraries from the released gem archives. I’ve therefore raised the issue on the Fedora Packaging Committee tracker[3]. The purpose of this email is to raise visibility of that issue among Ruby packagers, and to solicit input from knowledgeable and interested parties. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cucumber-messages/pull-request/2 [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Ruby/#_rubygems [3] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1512
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
