Please do not monkey patch core libraries in gems, unless the *purpose* of
your library is to add functionality to core, eg a library of extensions
like activesupport. Yes, this goes for additions as well as overrides. I
cannot tell you how many times I've seen a "harmless addition" mess things
up in confusing and hard to debug ways.

What method do you want to add to strings?

--
Avdi Grimm
http://avdi.org
On Jun 19, 2012 1:35 PM, "Iain Barnett" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to add a method to the String class for a gem I'm making.
> Obviously, I could just open it up and pop the method in, but I'd like to
> know what is the state-of-the-art for adding a method. Do I get anything
> better from putting the method in a module and then opening up the class
> and including it? I can't see why but I'd like to know.
>
> I don't wish to use a new class that inherits from String because I
> understand that there's a gotcha with String due to something done for
> performance reasons (though I can't remember the exact details I remember
> the warning!), and there's obvious good sides to the method being directly
> in String that far outweigh the inheritance angle.
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Iain
>

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
ruby-talk-google group. To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email 
to [email protected]. For more options, visit this 
group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/ruby-talk-google?hl=en

Reply via email to