On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joel Pearson <[email protected]> wrote: > That's an interesting way to do it. If I assume that any bang method I > write in a given class would also have a non-bang method, then I could > easily have a catch-all process define the methods for me when an > instance is generated. Cool! > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >
Yup! Hope this helps... happy hacking. By the way... pay attention at all the consequences of 'dup' See: http://ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Object.html#method-i-dup e. -- [email protected] | https://groups.google.com/d/forum/ruby-talk-google?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-talk-google" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
