Mirko Stocker wrote: > tests, so migrating should be doable in time. What I fear quite a bit is the > changes around the ScopeNode, which we use a lot. But we can work with Defn- > and DefsNodes instead, so that should work too. Yes, that's the way to go. > There are also things that > are easier to do with the newer version, I believe that LocalVarNodes now > know their name and not just their 'count'. Yes, they added specific names instead of indexes for ... something (some arguments, can't remember details). I'm finishing up a JRuby port of ParseTree (http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ParseTree/ ), and moving to the latest JRuby trunk fixed a lot of things I had problems with in the old code.
> the comments we have to attach to the AST. But that has to wait until after > the diploma thesis and our short trip to austria. > Where're you going in Austria? (If you happen to venture into Graz, I'm buying the first round of coffee). murphee -- Blog @ http://jroller.com/page/murphee Maintainer of EclipseShell @ http://eclipse-shell.sourceforge.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
