Martin,
Sorry for the delay in responding....
On 2/9/07, Martin Krauskopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
I think I'm ready to establish the project on the rubyforge. I've some
basic 'infrastructure' for writing tests against the protocol. Mainly
for classic-debugger now but should be easy to use it in the
remote-debug case as well, not sure how much it differ now after Markus'
changes. So for a writing a new test you just You just extend the
'TestBase' class and then just write a test like this:
====
def test_breakpoint_and_continue_from_other_file
create_test2 ["class Test2", "def print12", "puts 'one'","puts
'two'", "end", "end"]
create_socket ["require 'test2.rb'", "Test2.new.print12", "puts
'three'"]
send_test_breakpoint(2)
assert_breakpoint_added_no(1)
send_ruby("b [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4")
assert_breakpoint_added_no(2)
send_cont # test:1 -> test:2
assert_test_breakpoint(2)
send_next # test:1 -> test2:4
assert_breakpoint(@test2_name, 4)
send_cont # test2:4 -> finish
end
====
I've migrated hopefully all important tests from the debug.core.tests,
maybe some have forgotten and some new added. Current state is:
34 tests, 527 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
That's great!
The last question is the project's name. Seems that we agreed on the
debug-commons. So I would found a new project under
http://rubyforge.org/projects/debug-commons/ or
http://debug-commons.rubyforge.org/ respectively. Please send me your
rubyforge logins so I can add you as project admins.
debug-commons is fine with me. I'll have to join rubyforge, then I'll send
you my user name.
Finally I did some trivial changes into classic debugger. I would send
you a diff for RDT if needed. Not sure. I was without access to Ruby SVN
for last 14 days. I think there is a bug directly in debug.rb in Ruby. I
have to investigate now when I have fresh checkout of everything I need.
Can you send along the patch?
I've modified the readme contents inline below... (mostly tweaking the
english phrasing)
= debug-commons
== Overview
debug-commons currently consist of wrappers around various Ruby debugging
backends. 'Wrapping' in this case means that backends are enriched by
producing/consuming a unified XML-based
protocol. Currently there are two wrappers, one for Ruby "classic
debugger"
(debug.rb) and another for Kent Sibilev's ruby-debug gem implementation.
Both
protocols have a lot in common, however differ slightly due to the
nature of their implementation and behaviour. Take a look
at classic-debugger.txt and ruby-debug.txt files for more detailed
information
about individual protocols.
== History, Future, Aims
The project was originally developed as part of Ruby Development Tools[1].
The
debugger plugin was mainly developed by Markus Barchfeld with the help of
Christopher Williams, Werner Schuster (murphee), Mirko Stocker (and
others) who
work on other parts of RDT. Later Martin Krauskopf, implementing NetBeans
debugger module, wrote to RDT people about possible cooperation on the
backend
they had. First official email here:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31511654&forum_id=9198
(MK: RDT folks have invested and brought a nice bunch of work. I believe
both sides (and hopefully others) will gain a lot in the end).
This project was founded because there doesn't seem to be a general open
source solution in the Ruby world for debugger-frontend implementers. The
aim is to provide such a solution for anyone who wants to start (or is
already working) on a debugger frontend (standalone GUI debugger, an
IDE or editor plugin, remote CLI-based one, ...).
Currently there are RDT and NetBeans contributors working on this common
projec - and anyone is very
welcome to join.
There are some consideration to be done like joining/supporting a Common
Debugger Protocol (http://www.xdebug.org/docs-dbgp.php), better support
for
JRuby, ... [TBD - probably separate TODO] so feel free to join the mailing
list(s) for a discussion about current and feature plans [TBD - link to
MLs]
== Requirements
TBD - MK: I still think I'm getting Segmentation Fault with latest stable
Ruby,
but did not tried for longer period. Needs to investigate.
JRuby status doesn't work that much due to reopened:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-445
== Install
TBD - MK: Presumably available as a gem. But currently IDEs need to bundle
it
within the module.
== License
TBD - MK: Ruby License? Opinions? I'm quite bad on this. But I think that
Ruby
License would be OK. But we have to also keep Kent's license.
Any
lawyer here? :)
Thanks,
Chris
--
http://cwilliams.textdriven.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rubyeclipse-development mailing list
Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
