> Outside of this work do we have any other outstanding stuff to be > looked at > for the 0.9.0? [] Only some cleanup: It still seems as if there are two sets of constants which are used as keys in the launch configuration. Could we merge them? > > The other failing test is for the interpreter stuff, and until I have a > linux machine that can reproduce the error I'm not sure if I can nail > what's > going on. Essentially the libraries it's detecting are missing the set of > core stubs that get generated when you first add an interpreter. I don't > know if there's just some oddity going on with the test on the build > machine > - or if those stubs aren't getting generated and added to the library > list > on Linux (I'm guessing the former, since this works on Mac OSX). OK, I can check this error.
Thanks Markus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
