Martin Krauskopf wrote: > BTW it seems that there will be something like jruby-debug soon. I hope > I will have enough time to participate a lot on this piece. Might be > another debug-commons child or jruby-extras, does not matter to much. > jruby-debug would be good - BTW: yesterday I found out about a problem in JRuby and set_trace_func based debugging: if JRuby's JIT is turned on, this won't work, because the code that the JIT emits doesn't call the trace function. I guess, there's not much to do about this before 1.0, but I guess filing this as a bug would is necessary for post-1.0.
> Also it seems that DLTK people would join us in the future with > debug-commons with DBGp implementation. Future seems quite good for > ruby-debugging thanks to your initial contribution Markus! ;) > Have they committed to sharing their DBGp implementation? They have a Ruby version in their CVS but it's not based on the RDT/eclipse-debug code. If there's an interest: I've been working on my own Ruby DBGp implementation (with the RDT code as backend) - it's not complete, and I'm still trying to get it to connect with DLTK, but it's coming along. murphee ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
