On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Jim Weirich wrote: > I'm forwarding this to the RubyGems mailing list. The question is > what license covers RubyGems. I don't think we ever explicitly > stated, but since our intention was to eventually be included as > part of the Ruby distro, I am suggesting we use the same terms as > Ruby (e.g. choice of either the Ruby license or GPL). > > Agreement? > > Other than setup.rb (which is under the LGPL), the only other file > with an explicit copyright notice (that I've seen) is Mauricio's > package.rb file. It refers the reader to a LICENSE.txt file which > is not part of RubyGems, so I'm unclear what terms Mauricio > intended. So, this question is direct to Mauricio regarding the > package.rb file, would the terms mentioned above be acceptable to you?
As far as I'm concerned (and have any say) Ruby's license is good. Chad _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
