On 6/3/06, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 2, 2006, at 11:49 PM, John Gabriele wrote: > > > I just came across these posts: > > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/7423 > > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/7426 > > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/7479 > > > > Not sure how relevant they are to this, but, what is the current plan > > for rdoc/ri/gem integration? > > The next release of gems and ruby 1.8 will have integrated ri.
Sweet. Looking forward to it. :) Thanks. > > It would seem to me that the rdoc command should have an "--ri-gems" > > option such that I could cd over to my > > /opt/ruby-1.8.4/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems directory and from there run > > "rdoc --ri-gems" thus generating a pile of .yaml files in, maybe, an > > /opt/ruby-1.8.4/share/ri/1.8/gems directory... Is that the way it's > > going to work? > > Gems already has this feature. > > See gem help rdoc. Maybe you're referring to the CVS HEAD version here? I haven't tried it. I'm using the 0.8.11 release, and tried "gem rdoc --all". Although that does generate html docs in the lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/gem_name/rdoc directories, I don't see any yaml files anywhere. The only gems I've currently got installed are BlueCloth, RedCloth, and rake. Maybe some gems will emit ri docs while others will not? I didn't see anything in the spec (http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/20) about that though. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
