Jim, Thanks for the reply.
I haven't really browsed the code but there must be a method that gets an array of the gems that need to be updated. Can we have an option or command to just list these gems that need updating. gem outdated => [gem1,gem2,gem3,ferret] gem update gem1 gem2 gem3 Thanks dom On 11/29/06, Jim Weirich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/27/06, Dominic Sisneros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am on a windows machine and when I try to do a gem update, it always > fails after trying to update ferret, which has a windows compiled version a > few versions behind the current native compiled on the fly version. > What I was wondering, if there could be a option to exclude a gem from > trying to update, > > i.e.; gem update --except ferret There is no current option for that, however ... or, if there can be a command line option to list gems needing to be > updated, which we can then do individually > > gem update --list_outdated --> [out1, out2,..] This already works. For example: gem update rake flexmock will update both gems. -- -- -- Jim Weirich [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://onestepback.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas) _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
_______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
