On Dec 18, 2006, at 14:18, Eric Hodel wrote: > On Dec 16, 2006, at 08:54, Chad Fowler wrote: >> Eric, are you aware of fixing >> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php? >> func=detail&aid=982&group_id=126&atid=575. >> It looks like you did. I added a test i expected to fail and it >> passed. Looks like svn has the desired behavior now. > > I don't remember fixing it. If it is fixed go ahead and close the > bug.
Actually, this isn't our bug. Gem authors like to write broken extconf.rbs where they don't check the output of #have_library or #have_header (or whatever the header one is) so they'll build a Makefile when they shouldn't. There's really nothing we can do about this. If the C code is bad or the extconf.rb doesn't write a Makefile then things are good. -- Eric Hodel - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.segment7.net I LIT YOUR GEM ON FIRE! _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
