On Jan 7, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Jim Weirich wrote:
Gemwhich works off of file names that are loaded via require, not gem
names. Try:
gemwhich active_record/base
Ok, thanks. But, I thought that it would handle commandline apps.
What if a gem doesn't have a library, but only a commandline app?
% rails _1.1.6.5848_ -v
/opt/local/ruby-1.8.4/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:251:in
`report_activate_error': RubyGem version error: rails(1.0.0 not =
1.1.6.5848) (Gem::LoadError)
[...]
I thought rubygems was supposed to be able to handle any number of
segments
in a version.
Is version 1.1.6.5848 installed as a gem? Or is it installed from SVN?
As a gem.
% ls -ld *
drwxr-xr-x 9 root admin 306 Jan 6 23:12 actionmailer-1.2.5
drwxr-xr-x 9 root admin 306 Jan 6 23:22 actionmailer-1.2.5.5848
drwxr-xr-x 12 root admin 408 Jan 6 23:12 actionpack-1.12.5
drwxr-xr-x 11 root admin 374 Jan 6 23:22 actionpack-1.12.5.5848
drwxr-xr-x 11 root admin 374 Jan 6 23:12 actionwebservice-1.1.6
drwxr-xr-x 11 root admin 374 Jan 6 23:22
actionwebservice-1.1.6.5848
drwxr-xr-x 10 root admin 340 Jan 6 23:12 activerecord-1.14.4
drwxr-xr-x 10 root admin 340 Jan 6 23:22 activerecord-1.14.4.5848
drwxr-xr-x 4 root admin 136 Jan 6 23:11 activesupport-1.3.1
drwxr-xr-x 5 root admin 170 Jan 6 23:22 activesupport-1.3.1.5848
% pwd
/opt/local/ruby-1.8.5-p12/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems
Jim Freeze
\
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
