On 1/11/07, Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps there needs to be a better way of handling what goes into the > description field of a gem spec. Right now developers pretty much > throw whatever they want in there. Sometimes it is empty, sometimes it > is part of a README, including rdoc formatting, sometimes it is HTML, > etc. etc. Would it be possible to be explicit in the documentation and > either say *no markup* or specify a particular markup type? > > I've been trying to make the display of the description in gemtacular > nicer, but it just isn't happening because there is no consistency. In > the end it would probably be best to just indicate that no markup > should be included. > > Just thinking out loud here... :-) >
I think we can make a recommendation, but it will be hard to enforce. I think no markup is the right thing to suggest. Chad _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
