On 1/18/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/18/07, Chad Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sounds like a pretty serious edge case to me. RDoc isn't something > > you generally make a link to. It's something that lives inside your > > source and is generated. For all but the rare edge case, I think this > > would go unused. > > Then there has to be a way to dictate proper generation doesn't there? > It's going awefully far to designate something an "edge case" b/c it > doesn't conform to RDoc documentation. What if someone wants to use a > different doc system... What if someone writes a program in such a way > that RDoc can't even handle it well --that's rather easy actually. >
What if someone wanted to not use Ruby at all? _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
