Ruby 1.8.4. Can you say more about "binary mode" - is there some setting that I should verify or need to change? If so, why would the default be different b/w 0.9.0 and 0.9.1/0.9.2 (since I didn't customize any of those installs of rubygems)?
WG -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Berger, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Wes Gamble > > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:53 PM > > To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org > > Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gem repository and/or > > local geminstallation issues > > > > > > I had to revert back to 0.9.0 to get gem to work again. > > > > Looks like there are a lot of issues w/0.9.2 at least. Maybe > > 0.9.1 as well on Win XP? > > > > Any insight into the quality of 0.9.1/0.9.2. > > I've not had problems with it myself. BTW, what version of Ruby? > > In the past whenever I get bizarre errors from rubygems, deleting the > source_cache often helps. :) > > Random guess: binary mode. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or > privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication > in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the communication and any attachments. > _______________________________________________ > Rubygems-developers mailing list > Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
