On 4/27/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Hodel wrote: > > If you find tattle is reporting information you don't want public > > after you've published it, you should have checked out what it was > > doing first and not run tattle. > > > > (While the first release of tattle didn't have the report option, it > > was still simple enough to visit the tattle report page or inspect > > the source to discover what was being reported.) > > If you didn't want a security hole in your system you should have read > all the code first. > > Sound a little silly? > > I still haven't heard how the prefix information is useful, or why it > couldn't just be eliminated/turned off now that a few people have raised > concerns about it. What use is this information? Why keep it? > > - Charlie
I agree with everything Charlie just said :) -- Chad _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
