On Aug 14, 2007, at 14:22, Austin Ziegler wrote: > On 8/8/07, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jul 25, 2007, at 15:18, Alexey Verkhovsky wrote: >>> I'd rather manage package sources by editing /etc/rubygems >>> configuration file. >> This sounds like an excellent way to do it. > > And the Windows solution? The advantage to sources.gem is that it's in > the same place that Rubygems itself is. There's probably a better > solution overall, but let's not make a Unix-only solution, even though > I only use Windows for work development these days.
Right now the /etc/ part isn't implemented, default sources are built- in, active sources are stored in ~/.gemrc and sources are managed via `gem sources`. I think the multiuser windows box is a rarity so the ~/.gemrc should be sufficient. -- Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
