On Oct 1, 2007, at 05:37 , Alan C Francis wrote: >> I decided to go the opposite way around, and use >> Gem.configuration.update_sources instead of the hash-type access. It >> would probably be better to remove the hash access going forward, >> since it adds lots of complication and requires more manual >> documentation. > > Great. Thanks! > >> Fixed, I'm dumb. > > Phew. Thought I'd hosed myself :-) > > Are the team open to patches which are more refactoring than new > features ? I'd like to take a crack at tidying up the config_file > and maybe local_remote_options.
Yes, but I'd like to keep things stable until after RubyGems is merged into ruby 1.9. I think there's one more thing to go in before a beta release. There has been heavy refactoring in RubyGems in the last couple of releases, primarily driven by tinderbox, and I'm all for more. -- Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
