On Oct 6, 2007, at 07:54 , TRANS wrote: > The order in which libs are searched is in reverse of how they are > given in the gemspce's require_paths attribute. I realize that order > doesn't usually matter, but it can --I have a particular case in which > it does. The reverse order seems unintutive. Thought I'd just bring > that to light. Maybe it would be better to reverse it for a future > version.
By the same token, changing it may break gems that inadvertently depend on the order. I think it is best to leave it alone. -- Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
