On 10/22/07, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you misunderstand me. It is entirely reasonable for someone to
> install Ruby itself to /usr/local/lib/ruby, if it wasn't for Ruby
> using a version tier, ie. 1.8/, that would be a complete mess --the
> gem dir would be mixed in with all the other libs, ostruct.rb, io/,
> irb/, etc. But even with the tier, I don't think it's a good practice
> to mixing version tiers with not version tiers --"gems" is not a
> version of Ruby. Perhaps if the lib/ruby were divided like:
Oops. Scratch that last sentence. I was going to suggest:
lib/
ruby/
1.8/
core/
site/
gems/
or
lib/
ruby/
core/
1.8/
site/
1.8/
gems/
1.8/
But that doesn't seem quite right either.
T.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
