On Oct 29, 2007, at 17:46 , Tom Copeland wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:55 -0700, Eric Hodel wrote: >> On Oct 27, 2007, at 08:24 , Daniel Berger wrote: >>> I was thinking about the gem compatibility issue some more. I >>> guess the >>> first question is whether or not we can ensure that 0.9.4 can handle >>> gems built with 0.9.5 or later. Can we do that? >>> >>> If not, what about the possibility of catching this error? >>> >>> ERROR: While executing gem ... (TypeError) >>> can't instantiate uninitialized class >> >> This is because Gem::Platform is a class now, right? I can patch up >> Gem::Specification to make it backwards compatible. >> >> It looks like the release of 0.9.5 will be delayed until post- >> RubyConf. I have to work on my presentation. > > Hm, is there some way we can tweak the gem index to skip these or > something? Right now I've disabled gem index rebuilds to prevent > someone from releasing a gem and accidentally breaking the index for > everyone...
My proposed change should fix the indexer too. I'll test and commit tomorrow. -- Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
