On Nov 6, 2007 12:41 AM, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 6, 2007 12:33 AM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/5/07, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused. If I have a pure-ruby version of my lib, but also > > > have some extensions that can speed things up, should the pure-ruby > > > gem be named plainly? Eg. 'foo-1.0.0.gem'. But then what platform is > > > the compile-on-install gem? Am I going about this wrong? I'm starting > > > to think it would be easier to create two packages, one for the > > > pure-ruby gem and another for the optional extensions.
I need to provide these: * pure ruby version * compile-on-install version * win32 pre-built version I would like to make the first two a single gem, rather then two separate gems. To do that I need RubyGems not to abort if make fails. I am going to try to figure out a way to do that. But if someone already has an idea how, please let me know. T. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
