On Nov 14, 2007 11:48 AM, Tom Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, Alex Fenton is reporting that 0.9.2 is having trouble reading all > the gems in the index: > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=15417&group_id=5&atid=102
I just added some comment about that after digging the wxRuby gem issues, pasting the comment here: <quote> The other thing is that wxRuby is being marked as 'x86-mswin32' platform gem, when the file is 'i386-mswin32' Doing deep in the problem, I see this from the metadata: rubygems_version: 0.9.4 platform: i386-mswin32 Compared to mongrel-1.1.1-mswin32.gem: rubygems_version: 0.9.4 platform: mswin32 Err... anyone noticing the difference? who wxRuby team is coding the platform? there wasn't a 'i386-mswin32' Gem::Platform constant for that in 0.9.4... They are using Gem::Platform::WIN32 for mswin platform: rake/rakepackage.rb:80 self.platform = gem_platform Err... me confused... don't know why was that... </end_quote> Or wxRuby team was using the beta of rubygems to create the gem (since Gem::PLATFORM::WIN32 on beta will generate the new platform syntax) or they managed to brake RubyGems ;-) I used the same constant for Mongrel and the platform is correct. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
