On Nov 24, 2007 11:58 PM, Daniel Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007 5:11 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Daniel and Eric, what do you think about this? Where should I create a > > fake platform specific gem to test this out? > > > > I guess that final 1.8.6-p111 One-Click will ship with 0.9.4 for the time > > being. > > I'm not sure yet. > > At this point I'm inclined to think we should go back to the "ask to > install" approach, and add a "--no-ask" option to skip it, because > there's always going to be a case where a user wanted version X but > instead got version Y. >
It's odd because of the two gems with the same version number, RubyGems choose ::RUBY one instead of 'mswin32'. I failed to find the right place where that comparison is made to recreate the scenario and provide a patch, is beyond my knowledge and understanding on how RubyGems works. (maybe need to invest more time on it). Also, is useless the platform switch in this case, since it always prioritize the RUBY version instead of the platform specific one. Oh well, maybe a fresh look during the week will be more productive. I'm burned out :-P Thanks in advance for your time. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
