On Dec 16, 2007 12:35 AM, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I cleaned up a bunch of bugs that arrived with 0.9.5, and would like > to do a 1.0 release of RubyGems Monday or Tuesday. > > I forwarded one Windows-releated bug to Luis Lavena, but maybe > somebody else can help? > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=16259&group_id=126&atid=575 >
Just replied on tracker about it, need to figure out a clean solution for it. > Are there any other outstanding issues or important bugs that should > be fixed in the tracker? Or bugs that didn't make it into the tracker? > I'll give a mingw32 a whirl too since MinGW will became a option for upcoming RubyInstaller (OneClick). There is also the problem with binaries (executables) in <gem>/bin, they are being overwritten to add the shebang to them. Take a look at the rmagick win32 gem, they have 4 windows executables there than when installed, get replaced by just the shebang, rendering them useless. > I think think all the unfixed bugs in the tracker can wait until a > future release. > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=575&group_id=126&func=browse The only upstanding bug I see there is this: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=15790&group_id=126&atid=575 Which was marked by you as 'accepted'. I'll also add this to my test loop today. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
