On Dec 17, 2007, at 04:13 AM, Luis Lavena wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007 8:04 AM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello Guys, >> >> I'm sad to inform that latest test with trunk (revision 1551) still >> fails with gems that uses 'mswin32' platform. >> >> To better show the problem, uploaded a video to google: >> >> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5029229715132035200&hl=en >> >> I think google made the video quality low, so currently I'm uploading >> it to my host and will post a followup with the link (less than 1 >> hour). >> > > The higher resolution videos: > > http://mmediasys.com/rubygems/rubygems_behavior-2.mp4 (12MB) > http://mmediasys.com/rubygems/rubygems_behavior-2.mov (112MB) > > Still need to check what codecs works cross platform, and also it > seems QT7 Animation codec don't work so well on windows :-P
At 04:11, where `gem install pkg\...` doesn't work, but `cd pkg; gem install ...` works may be due to Dir glob usage in lib/rubygems/ dependency_installer.rb:54 Does Dir['pkg\*'] work properly in Windows from irb? Does `gem install pkg/...` work? 07:13: > Gem::Platform::WIN32 is badly broken. (for peace of mind, why don't > we remove it?) Agreed. If I recall correctly, the WIN32 constant is only needed by gem authors, so having a missing constant will force them to switch to CURRENT. I will do the same with the remaining constants, and add a const_missing that tells gem authors how to upgrade. 07:16: > Gem::Platform::CURRENT work as expected, leave it alone. (and warn > all rubygems developers to stick to it!) Yes. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
