On Feb 1, 2008, at 02:23 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Mark Hubbart wrote: >>>> Plus one might not have a rubyforge project. >>> > [...] >> The "real" project could be on sourceforge.org, or code.google.com. > > Maybe there needs to a directive to say whwere the project is?
There is also a #homepage= for Gem::Specification, but with the current gem repository, this is a bikeshed objection as under 1% of gems are published without a rubyforge project. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
