On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose instead an appropriate exception could be raised. Please > > take a shot at it.
Yes, an exceptions seems the right way to handle it, I realized that today. So, to confirm, I would make something like a custom Gem::ExitException, and catch/handle that in the 'gem' executable. Sound right? If there is a different exception you'd like me to use, either a standard one or one already in rubygems, let me know. Thanks, -- Chad _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
